Barnard 33 & NGC– The Horsehead and Flame Nebula - 6 hours in HaLRGB

Date: December 17, 2025

Cosgrove’s Cosmos Catalog #0157

Anchored o the leftmost star forming the Belt on Orion, the famous Horsehead and Flame Nebula was a secondary target caught late at night back in October (Click image for hi-res version via AstroBin.com)

Where Dust Meets Fire: B33 and NGC 2024 in Orion


Introduction

This is another secondary target caught late at night during my capture session in late October. Once my primary target had been set, I caught a few hours on this target - one I normally have a hard time capturing, as past November we were in a sea of clouds!

I have shot this target before, but I have never captured the vertical striations that can be seen in the curvature of the nebula that can be seen behind the Horsehead nebula.

For this effort, I took a longer chunk of my integration time dedicated to Ha narrowband capture, where those details can most likely be found.

🔭 Project Summary

Target: B33 – The Horsehead Nebula (with NGC 2024 – The Flame Nebula)

Capture Dates: October 27 & 28, 2025

Constellation: Orion • Distance: ≈ 1,300–1,500 light-years

Type: Dark Nebula (B33) silhouetted against emission backdrop (IC 434) + Emission Nebula / H II Region (NGC 2024)

Imaging Period: October 27–28, 2025 • Total Integration: 5 h 59 m 30 s (LRGB + Ha)

Filters: L · R · G · B (ZWO 36mm Unmounted LRGB Gen II) + Ha (Astronomik 36mm 6 nm)

Telescope: William Optics FLT 132mm f/7 APO Refractor + P-FLAT7A 0.8× Reducer

Camera: ZWO ASI2600MM-Pro (−15 °C; Gain 0 LRGB, Gain 100 Ha)

Mount: iOptron CEM60 on custom steel pier

Processing: PixInsight & Photoshop

Location: Whispering Skies Observatory · Honeoye Falls, NY (USA)

Field Includes: IC 431, IC 432, IC 435, LBN 934, LBN 944, LBN 958, LBN 962


🔗 Detailed Processing Walkthrough →

The WO 132 f/5.5 Platform, with an iOpron CEM 60 mount, and a ZWO ASI2600MM-Pro camera.

 

📸 Capture Details

Nights: October 27 & 28, 2025

Number of frames shown is after bad or questionable frames were culled.

Channel / Filter Frames × Exposure Settings Total
L — ZWO Lum (36mm) 18 × 90 s bin 1×1 • −15 °C • Gain 0 27 m
R — ZWO Red (36mm) 35 × 90 s bin 1×1 • −15 °C • Gain 0 52 m 30 s
G — ZWO Green (36mm) 35 × 90 s bin 1×1 • −15 °C • Gain 0 52 m 30 s
B — ZWO Blue (36mm) 35 × 90 s bin 1×1 • −15 °C • Gain 0 52 m 30 s
Ha — Astronomik 6 nm (36mm) 35 × 300 s bin 1×1 • −15 °C • Gain 100 2 h 55 m
Total Integration: 5 h 59 m 30 s (LRGB + Ha)

Calibration Frames

  • 30 × darks @ 90 s, bin 1×1, −15 °C, Gain 0
  • 30 × darks @ 300 s, bin 1×1, −15 °C, Gain 100
  • 30 × dark-flats @ each flat exposure time, bin 1×1, −15 °C, Gain 0 or Gain 100 as needed
  • Flats: 15 each — L, Ha, R, G, B

Table of Contents Show (Click on lines to navigate)

    Back To Top

    Annotated Image

    This annotated image was created with the ImageSolver and FinderChart scripts in PixInsight.

    The Location in the Sky

    This annotated image created with ImageSolver and FinderChart Scripts in PixInsight.


    🔭 About The Target

    Overview

    The Horsehead and Flame region is anchored by the dark nebula B33 (Barnard 33), a dense foreground dust cloud whose familiar profile is seen in silhouette against the bright hydrogen emission of IC 434. Nearby is the Flame Nebula, NGC 2024 (also cataloged as Sh2-277), an active star-forming emission nebula crossed by prominent dust lanes. This entire scene sits in the constellation Orion, immediately south of Orion’s Belt star Alnitak, along the western edge of the Orion B molecular cloud; the Horsehead itself is commonly associated with the larger dark cloud complex LDN 1630. Distances reported for this part of Orion vary by technique and reference, but a practical working value is roughly 1,300–1,500 light-years from Earth, placing it in our local spiral-arm neighborhood where fine structure can be resolved with modest amateur equipment given sufficient integration time.

    History

    The Flame Nebula was first recorded in astronomy during the great era of visual surveys: William Herschel cataloged it in the late 18th century while surveying nebular objects in Orion. The Horsehead’s discovery story is different because its signature shape is a contrast feature that photography reveals far more readily than the eye; it was identified on photographic plates in 1888 by Williamina Fleming as part of Harvard’s pioneering plate-based sky work. In the early 20th century, E. E. Barnard helped establish the modern interpretation by treating it as obscuring material—real dust and gas with structure—rather than a “hole” in the glow, and it has carried the Barnard designation ever since.

    Science

    This field is a compact laboratory for understanding how massive stars reshape their birth environments. The sharp boundary where the glow behind the Horsehead meets the cold dust of the cloud is a classic photon-dominated (photodissociation) interface: ultraviolet radiation heats and chemically stratifies the cloud surface, producing measurable gradients that have been extensively studied using molecular spectroscopy at millimeter- and infrared-wavelengths. The Flame Nebula, in contrast, is a luminous window into embedded star formation; much of its young cluster is heavily obscured in visible light, so infrared and X-ray observations are used to inventory newborn stars, probe their accretion and outflows, and measure how many retain disks in a harsh, irradiated environment. Together, these targets connect the “sculpting” physics at a cloud edge with the hidden, ongoing formation of stars deeper inside the same complex.

    Notable Features in this Frame

    What makes the Horsehead and Flame pairing so compelling is that it mixes stark geometry with subtle structure: the Horsehead’s silhouette is unforgiving of over-processing (it is easy to crush the dust into a flat cutout). At the same time, the Flame rewards careful highlight control to preserve its branching dust lanes and layered glow. This broader framing also adds valuable context by including additional cataloged nebular and dust features—IC 431, IC 432, IC 435, and the Lynds dark-nebula entries LBN 934, LBN 944, LBN 958, and LBN 962—reinforcing that these headline objects are simply the most dramatic knots in a much larger, textured landscape of gas and dust. For observers, it is also a reminder that this region spans a huge dynamic range: visually, it can be challenging under light pollution, but with imaging, it becomes one of the clearest demonstrations of how dust, emission, and starlight interact on parsec scales.

    About the Project

    Selection and Planning

    This is my second Orion target from my last capture session in late October.

    I found that my primary targets were set somewhere between 2:30 and 3:30 am. You have to love those long, cool nights in October! The primary targets were done for the night, and I still had a few more hours before sunrise!

    I noticed that Orion was up by then. Orion is absolutely my favorite constellation. When I was a kid, I spent many a cold winter’s night out with my 2.4” Sears Refractor and seeing Orion standing tall in the sky with his belt and sword was a favorite target. One I do not get to shoot very often because of our weather. It seems like November comes along and bring with it a stubborn and seemingly endless cloud deck! I seldom have the opportunity to shoot Orion in the winter here.

    So, here was my chance. I would not likely get much integration time, but beggars can’t be choosers! I would get what time on target I could!

    The first target I chose was M42. I have already shared that project:

    M42/43 Project Post

    I used my wide-field FRA400 platform for this purpose.

    My next choice was the region around Alnitak, including Barnard 33 (The HorseHead Nebula) and NGC 2024 (The Flame Nebula). I have covered that before (I’ll discuss it in the next section), but I wanted to revisit it.

    Why? Well, it’s been a while since I shot it last. I now have faster scopes, better cameras, better processing tools, and more processing experience. I wanted to see what I could do with where I am now. Also, the last time I photographed this, I hoped to capture the shimmering vertical striations visible in the nebula behind the Horsehead. In my last shot, you could see hints of it. But I really wanted to bring it out this time around if I could.

    Previous Efforts

    In fact, the first time I photographed this region is not documented on my website.

    It was over 30 years ago, and I was shooting gas-hypered Kodak Tech Pan film. I gas-hypered it myself and then loaded it into an OM-1 camera attached to a Meade wide-field 622 scope.

    I had no telescope drive in those days, but I was able to mount this on a friend's massive fork-mounted 16-inch Newtonian scope. This was Rick Albrecht’s scope. If you have read my posts, then you have heard this name several times. Rick has a wonderful 16” scope, mounted on a massive steel fork mount with an 18” bronze drive gear. It was situated in a domed observatory on a hill. Rick had built everything himself - down to cutting the teeth on the drive gear, grinding the optics, welding the mount, you name it - he did it! I was fortunate enough to mount my little scope on his beast of a scope and go along for the ride. In fact, I think this is the only image that ever really came out!

    Taken some 33 years ago on Gas-Hypered Techpan 2415 film, OM-1 Camera body, Meade 633 Rih Field scope, and piggy back ride on Rick Albrecht’s wonderful 16-inch fork-mounted netwonin telescope.

    There was then a 30-year gap in my interest in astronomy. Once I was back in the game, I started trying to shoot targets in Orion again when I had a chance.

    My first effort was in February of 2020. I shot 90 minutes with a one-shot camera on my William’s Optics 132mm f/7 FLT. This can be seen here:

    My First Barnard 33 Shot - Feb 2020

    My second effort was in December of 2021. This was a 4-hour and 40-minute integration using the same scope, but with my first mono camera - the ASI1600MM-Pro. This shot turned out well, and you could see hints of the vertical stational pattern I was interested in capturing. However, the bright star Alnitak produced numerous microlens artifacts with that camera, which greatly complicated my image Processing. You can see the Project here:

    My Second Barndard 33 Shot - Dec 2021

    Below are all three version so you can compare them.


    Comparison of the 2020, 2021, and 2025 efforts


    Capture Strategy

    I decided to capture this on my William Optics 132mm FLT, same as the first two. But this time I will be using the flattener and 0.8X reducer, which took it from f/7 to f/5.5. It now sports a next-generation ASI2600MM-Pro camera, so I don’t expect any microlensing artifacts.

    I would be shooting primarily in LRGB with 90-second exposures, a gain of 0, and a cooler temp of -15C.

    But I would also be going heavy with 300-second Ha narowband exposures to try and get the vertical striaion patterns I wanted. This would also have a cooler temperature of -15C but a camera gain of 100 to help with the reduced narrowband signal.

    Data Capture

    Data capture was done on the nights of October 27 and 28, 2025. On the first night, I captured only Ha, R, G, and B subs. The second night, I captured Ha and LRGB subs.

    So why no L subs on the first night?

    Operator error - pure and simple. I just messed up the sequence programs! On the second night, I noticed this and corrected it.

    Tracking seemed to go well.

    Later blink analysis revealed no frames were eliminated due to clouds or other issues. Every frame captured was used!

    🧩 Capture Time by Filter

    Total
    5 h 59 m 30 s
    Percentages are based on total integrated exposure time.
    L — 27 m (7.51%) R — 52 m 30 s (14.60%) G — 52 m 30 s (14.60%) B — 52 m 30 s (14.60%) Ha — 2 h 55 m (48.69%)

    Processing Overview

    The processing for this project fits my high-level processing workflow for the HaLRGB image as seen below.

    My typical HaLRGB Starless Workflow.

    I did all of my linear processing the on the Ha, L, and RGB images and then removed the stars. The starless images went nonlinear and processing was done to enhance each of the images.

    A hybrid LHa image was created to use a the the new luminance image. This was interesting because the two images had very different levels of details as can be seen below:


    Master Lum vs Ha images


    I experimented with different weights, but finally used a 50-50 weight scheme. When I used this image to insert it into the RGB image, I encountered a problem: the resulting image was too light, and the reds turned a pale pink.

    The LHa signal was so strong relative to the RGB image that I needed to back up and use LinFit to calibrate the RGB image to the LHa signal level. After doing this, I had pretty good results.

    Normally, at this point, I would add the stars back in and then move to Photoshop to do the final polishing.

    However, I noticed that some polishing operations could hurt stars if they were in he region being tweaked. So, I have begun to change my workflows to accommodate this.

    Before adding the stars back in, I saved the starless RGB image as a 16-bit unsigned TIFF, imported it into Photoshop, and then made additional polishing changes. The image is then exported again into PixInsight, and the stars are re-added This acts to better protect the stars. .


    Detailed and Annotated Image Processing Walkthrough

    Typically, I conclude one of these imaging projects by documenting the processing steps I used on this image. But this section can make the overall post very large and, at times, slow to load.

    I am now creating a secondary, standalone page to hold this information. You can access this page by clicking the link below. Returning to this page is as simple as clicking the back arrow in your browser or selecting a different menu option at the top of the page.

    I hope you like this new format!

    Hit the Link below to see the detailed image processing walkthrough page for this Imaging Project!


    Final Results

    I am pleased with the final results!

    Given the low integration times, I was able to pull much more detail out of the shimmering “curtain” behind the Horsehead nebula. I am no longer having to deal with microlensing artifacts with this new camera. The bright stars are still bloated and have some flare, but that is hard to avoid.

    I am also pretty happy with the framing.

    With the 0.8X reducer, the field of view is wider, allowing me to include IC 432, seen on the far left. It also includes some amazing Ha pillars in the upper-left quadrant, which are often missing from some compositions.

    One thing I was concerned with at first was the structure visible in IC 432 and other small nebulae in the field. At first, I thought this was a lens or processing artifact, but after looking at other images on Astrobin with a wider field of view, I realized these were actual features of the nebula and should, in fact, be there!


    More Information

    🔭 Target Details

    📜 History & Naming

    🔬 Science & Observations

    💡 Interesting Facts & Outreach


    Capture Hardware

    • Scope: William Optics 132mm f/7 FLT APO Refractor

    • Flattener/Reducer: P-FLAT7A 0.8X Reducer

    • Focus Motor: Pegasus Astro Focus Cube 2

    • Cam Rotator: Pegasus Astro Falcon

    • Guide Scope: Sharpstar 61EDPHII

    • Guide Focus Motor: ZWO EAF

    • Mount: Ioptron CEM 60

    • Tripod: Custom Steel Pier - New!

    • Camera: ZWO ASI2600MM-Pro

    • Filter Wheel: ZWO EFW 7x36mm II

    • Filters: ZWO Gen II 36mm Unmounted LRGB

    • Astronomiks 36mm Unmounted 6nm Ha, O3, and S2 Filters

    • Guide Camera: ZWO ASI290MM-Mini

    • Dew Strips: Dew-Not Heater strips for Main and Guide Scopes

    • Power Dist: Pegasus Astro Pocket Powerbox

    • USB Dist: Startech 8 slot USB 3.0 Hub

    • Polar Align Cam: IPolar

    • Computer: Mele Quieter 4c Fanless Micro-Computer running Windows 11

    Software

    • Capture Software: PHD2 Guider, NINA

    • Image Processing: Pixinsight, Photoshop - assisted by Coffee, extensive processing indecision and second-guessing, editor regret, and much swearing…..

    Click below to visit the Telescope Platform Version used for this image.

    Patrick A. Cosgrove

    A retired technology geek leveraging his background and skills in Imaging Systems and Computers to pursue the challenging realm of Astrophotography. This has been a fascinating journey where Art and Technology confront the beauty and scale of a universe that boggles the mind…. It’s all about capturing ancient light - those whispering photons that have traveled long and far….

    https://cosgrovescosmos.com/
    Next
    Next

    Messier 42/43 – The Great Orion Nebula - 6.35 hours in HaLRGB