Messier 104 - The Sombrero Galaxy - 11 Hours in LRGB - Lessons from a Challenging Project

Date: April 25, 2026

Cosgrove’s Cosmos Catalog #0160

Messier 104 - The Sombrero Galaxy (Click image for hi-res version via AstroBin.com.)

M104 — The Sombrero Galaxy: a brilliant central bulge, a razor-sharp dust lane, and one of the most recognizable profiles in the Messier catalog.


🔭 Project Summary

Target: Messier 104 – The Sombrero Galaxy / NGC 4594

Capture Dates: April 11, 20, and 21, 2026

Constellation: Virgo • Distance: ≈ 28–30 million light-years

Type: Nearly edge-on spiral galaxy with prominent dust lane and bright central bulge

Imaging Period: April 11–21, 2026 • Total Integration: 11 h 00 m (LRGB)

Filters: L · R · G · B (ZWO 36 mm LRGB Gen II)

Telescope: Sharpstar SCA260 V2 260 mm f/5.0 Special Cassegrain Astrograph (≈1300 mm)

Camera: ZWO ASI2600MM-Pro (−15 °C; Gain 0 LRGB)

Mount: iOptron CEM70 on custom steel pier

Processing: PixInsight (LRGB) & Photoshop

Location: Whispering Skies Observatory · Honeoye Falls, NY (USA)

Acquisition notes: L: 193 × 90 s; R: 89 × 90 s; G: 80 × 90 s; B: 78 × 90 s at −15 °C, Gain 0; total 11 h 00 m after culling bad or questionable subs.


🔗 Detailed Processing Walkthrough →

 

The Sharpstar SCA 260 V2 Platform (and yours truly!) (click on image to go to the blog entry for this scope_)

 
 

📸 Capture Details

Nights: April 11, 20, and 21, 2026

Channel / Filter Frames × Exposure Settings Total
L — ZWO Lum (36 mm unmounted) 193 × 90 s bin 1×1 • −15 °C • Gain 0 4 h 49 m 30 s
R — ZWO Red (36 mm unmounted) 89 × 90 s bin 1×1 • −15 °C • Gain 0 2 h 13 m 30 s
G — ZWO Green (36 mm unmounted) 80 × 90 s bin 1×1 • −15 °C • Gain 0 2 h 00 m
B — ZWO Blue (36 mm unmounted) 78 × 90 s bin 1×1 • −15 °C • Gain 0 1 h 57 m
Total Integration (after culling): 11 h 00 m (LRGB)

Calibration Frames

  • 30 × dark frames @ 90 s, bin 1×1, −15 °C, Gain 0
  • 30 × dark-flats @ each flat exposure time, bin 1×1, −15 °C, Gain 100 or Gain 0 as needed
  • Flats: 15 each — L, R, G, B

Table of Contents Show (Click on lines to navigate)

    Back To Top

    Annotated Image

    This annotated image was created with the ImageSolver and FinderChart scripts in PixInsight.

    The Location in the Sky

    This annotated image was created with the ImageSolver and FinderChart scripts in PixInsight.


    🔭 About The Target

    Overview

    Messier 104, better known as the Sombrero Galaxy, is one of the most recognizable galaxies in the spring sky. It is also cataloged as M104 and NGC 4594. The galaxy lies in the constellation Virgo, near the border with Corvus, and is roughly 28–30 million light-years from Earth. Its common name comes from its appearance: a bright central bulge surrounded by a broad, dark dust lane that gives it the look of a wide-brimmed hat. From our point of view, the galaxy appears nearly edge-on, making the dust band especially prominent. 

    Discovery and Naming

    M104 was discovered in 1781 by the French astronomer Pierre Méchain, a close colleague of Charles Messier. It was not included in the original published Messier catalog, but Messier later added a note about it in his personal copy of Connoissance des Temps. Much later, in 1921, Camille Flammarion identified that note with NGC 4594, and the object became known as Messier 104. That makes M104 an interesting case: it carries a Messier number, but it was added after the original Messier catalog had already been published. 

     

    Charles Messier (1730-1817)

    Pierre Méchain (1744-1804)

    (Credit: By Hurle - Stoyan R. et al. Atlas of the Messier Objects: Highlights of the Deep Sky. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. — P. 23. Original painting is located at the Bibliothèque de l'Observatoire de Paris., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=9784

     

    The Science

    Scientifically, the Sombrero Galaxy is an especially interesting system because it does not fit neatly into the simple mental picture many people have of a spiral galaxy. It has a large, bright central bulge, a sharply defined dust lane, and a massive halo of stars and globular clusters. NASA describes it as one of the more massive objects associated with the Virgo galaxy region, with a mass on the order of hundreds of billions of suns. At its center is a supermassive black hole, and the structure of the galaxy suggests a complex evolutionary history, likely shaped by mergers and interactions over time. 

    Incredible Hubble Telescope view of M104. (Credit: By ESA/Hubble, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=163685254)

    Interesting Facts

    For observers and imagers, M104 is a rewarding but somewhat challenging target. It is bright enough to be seen in modest telescopes under decent skies, but the details that make it famous — the thin dust lane, bright nucleus, extended halo, and subtle outer structure — benefit from good seeing, careful processing, and enough integration time to hold the faint outer regions without blowing out the core.

    One useful bit of trivia is that M104 has one of the most distinctive profiles of any Messier galaxy; even a small image often makes it immediately recognizable. Another is that modern infrared observations, including those from the James Webb Space Telescope, show structures hidden from ordinary visible-light views, helping astronomers study the stars, dust, and history behind the familiar “sombrero” shape. 

    About the Project

    Planning and Weather

    After a brutal winter and an early spring that brought cold, wet weather and very high winds, we finally had a break in the clouds on April 11th.

    Gearing up for the first capture session of 2026, I chose my targets, and this being galaxy season, I was looking forward to choosing a great target for the SCA260. I finally chose Messier 104.

    This target is low in our skies, so it provides a narrow window for capture. I had only shot this once before, in June of 2023.

    At that time, I was only able to gather 1.7 hours of LRGB data, shot with my AP130 f/8.35 platform, while wildfire smoke was in the air. I wanted to see what I could do with the new scope and more time for integration.

    That project can be seen here:

    Messier 104 - June 2023 Effort

    The image from that effort can be seen below:

    My M104 effort of June 2023.

    Telescope Concerns

    While prepping the scope for use on the first evening, I happened to look through it and inspect the main mirror.

    My heart froze for a second - it looked filthy!

    During my last captures in October of 2025, I had run into a lot of dew problems, and the SCA260 was a dew magnet. I fashioned a crude dew shield out of plastic, but I still ended up with dew forming on the front of the secondary, and when the scope was pointing to the sky, dew could form and drip into the scope, hitting the main mirror. In addition to this, the fans on the scope circulate air around the mirror, and I am sure that also sucks in dust and whatnot.

     

    My Crude Dew Shield.

     

    Processing Overview

    Preprocessing

    Because I wanted the sharpest image possible, I spent a lot of time scrutinizing the data before running the WBPP stacking.

    I blinked all the files and removed 17 subs, mostly due to thin clouds. From Blink's perspective, things did not look too bad.

    But since I wanted the sharpest possible images, I also ran SubFrameSelector on the frames to assess star sizes. When my goal is super-sharp images, I often screen for frames where the star sizes are much larger than the rest and remove them.

    When I did that here, I saw the following disturbing pattern:

    This is a plot for the subs taken with the L filter. This is a disturbing sequence!

    Yow!

    You can clearly see a trend here. We start the evening with small star sizes, and as the evening progresses, the star sizes grow and grow, and by the end of the evening, they are just terrible!

    The same pattern was observed across all 3 nights and all 4 filters.

    My first thought was that the slow buildup of dew could cause this. The SCA260 is a dew magnet, so that was possible. The other possibility is atmospheric absorption as the target set towards the west. For me, this is a low target, and as it set, I was looking through an increasing amount of atmosphere.

    I really did not expect to run into any dew problems this time of year, but there was some dew.

    So this trend could be caused by dew or the atmosphere - or both! Either way, it wasn't improving my image quality.

    So I culled the worst frames. In total, between Blink and SubFrameSelector, I removed 62 frames, totaling 1.55 hours of integration.

    Post-Processing

    The processing plan for this image was pretty straightforward.

    I used my typical LRGB workflow that looks something like this:

    My typical LRGB Starless Workflow.

    The processing itself should have been very simple. However, I found it fairly challenging.

    The stars were larger than I liked and looked a bit bloated. Detail in the galaxy was not as crisp as I had hoped, and I had a challenge managing the color of the galaxy itself.

    Some images are easy to process and practically process themselves! This was not one of those images.

    I found that, with this target, the simplest processing worked best. Many of the things I typically do to bring out faint features did not produce results I liked with this target. So I ended up keeping things simple.

    I did my first pass on processing the image and was not at all satisfied with the result. So I started over.

    On the second pass, I took quite a bit of time working with the linear images. I tried a lot of variations with BlurXTerminator and found that I could get good results with it, but I had to run it at very aggressive levels.

    I also tend to run LHE at the fine and medium scales to bring out detail, but in this image, I found it was causing artifacts in the bright regions that I did not like.

    In the end, I greatly simplified my processing steps, and this gave the best results.

    Lately, I have been creating several versions of the Stars-Only image. Each has a different stretch level, so I have three sets of star sizes to choose from. I try them all, seeing which seems to help the final composition the best. In this case, I thought the smaller stars would be better, given the bloating. But to my surprise, I liked the look with the larger stars, and so that is what I went with.

    The final image was aggressively cropped to scale the galaxy. Unfortunately, this also tends to highlight the bloated stars. So, while the final image came out OK, it is not one I was pleased with.


    Detailed and Annotated Image Processing Walkthrough

    Typically, I conclude one of these imaging projects by documenting the processing steps I used on this image. But this section can make the overall post very large and, at times, slow to load.

    I am now creating a secondary, standalone page to hold this information. You can access this page by clicking the link below. Returning to this page is as simple as clicking the back arrow in your browser or selecting a different menu option at the top of the page.

    I hope you like this new format!

    Use the link below to see the detailed image processing walkthrough for this imaging project.

    Messier 104 Image Processing Deep Dive


    Final Results

    The final image is a disappointment for me, mainly because I know the system is capable of better. I had really hoped for a better result with more crisp details. Clearly, I have some work to do on the telescope.

    I need to clean the optics and address any resulting collimation issues. I also need to address the dew issue more aggressively. I had purchased a large eyepiece dew heater and some flat wire; I plan to wrap the secondary with the dew heater and run flat wire along the edge of one of the secondary support vanes to reduce dew formation.


    More Information

    🔭 Target Details

    📜 History & Naming

    🔬 Science & Observations

    💡 Interesting Facts & Outreach


    Imaging Platform Used

    Platform used for this project

    The block below summarizes the exact rig configuration for the capture period. Use the link to view the full platform version log and component details.
    SCA260 V2 • Ver 1.0
    Platform
    Highlights
    SCA260 V2 · iOptron CEM70 · ASI2600MM-Pro · OAG-L / ASI174MM-Mini guiding
    Card
    Card image is clickable — it links to the platform version page above.

    Software

    • Capture Software: PHD2 Guider, NINA

    • Image Processing: PixInsight, Photoshop - assisted by Coffee, extensive processing indecision and second-guessing, editor regret, and much swearing…

    Patrick A. Cosgrove

    A retired technology geek leveraging his background and skills in Imaging Systems and Computers to pursue the challenging realm of Astrophotography. This has been a fascinating journey where Art and Technology confront the beauty and scale of a universe that boggles the mind…. It’s all about capturing ancient light - those whispering photons that have traveled long and far….

    https://cosgrovescosmos.com/
    Next
    Next

    First Light on the AP155 Platform: M81, M82, and NGC 3077 - 4.6 Hours of HaLRGB!